Can a single act of faith transcend the universal laws of human morality?

Art · Published 3 October 2026 Swipe more like this →

In short: In 1843, Søren Kierkegaard published a radical meditation on the biblical story of Abraham. Writing as Johannes de silentio, he argued that faith is an incommunicable paradox that exists beyond rational ethics. This controversial work challenges whether an individual can ever truly justify a private duty to God.

Fear and Trembling centers on the Binding of Isaac, where Abraham is commanded to sacrifice his son. Silentio distinguishes Abraham from tragic heroes like Agamemnon or Brutus, whose sacrifices were understood by their communities as serving a higher, rational purpose. Abraham, by contrast, acts in total isolation. His decision cannot be justified through the universal ethical framework of Hegel or Greek philosophy, leading Silentio to propose a 'teleological suspension of the ethical'—a state where faith overrides all moral obligations to others.

The text introduces the 'knight of faith,' who, unlike the knight of infinite resignation, believes that he will receive back what he has surrendered 'by virtue of the absurd.' This movement is not a logical deduction but a paradoxical leap. Because this faith is incommunicable, Abraham remains silent, a concealment that Silentio contrasts with the demonic, where silence is born of guilt. For Abraham, silence is a necessary condition of his direct, absolute relationship with God.

The work has sparked intense debate for over a century. Critics like Emmanuel Levinas argued that this suspension of ethics is dangerous, potentially justifying violence by claiming divine mandate. Others, such as Jacques Derrida, saw in Abraham's paradox a structure that mirrors all difficult ethical decision-making. Meanwhile, scholars continue to debate whether the text’s own pseudonymous author, who admits he cannot understand faith, intended the work to be a logical defense or a deliberate illustration of the limits of human reason.

Biographical readings often link the book to Kierkegaard’s 1841 broken engagement to Regine Olsen. While Kierkegaard himself insisted that his pseudonyms were distinct voices, many commentators view the knight of faith’s hope for restoration as a reflection of the author’s own longing. Published on October 16, 1843, the book was initially ignored, only gaining massive influence in the 20th century as a foundational text for existentialist thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and theologians like Karl Barth.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

• Can human beings be truly moral without the guidance of a divine authority?
• Is salvation earned through good deeds or granted solely by faith alone?
• Can we build a moral framework without relying on supernatural guidance or religious texts?
• Is morality merely a divine decree, or does God command what is already good?
• Did Abraham actually sacrifice his son, or was it a divine test of faith?
• Why Jorge Luis Borges believed that making stories feel natural is a literary failure
• Ivan Turgenev’s 1862 masterpiece captured the explosive generational divide of 19th-century Russia.
• How a nineteenth-century folk epic became the bedrock of Finnish national identity
• Why modern fantasy literature is rooted in ancient myths and medieval storytelling traditions
• How a failed motocross manga and a Chinese medical anecdote created a global phenomenon.
• Fan fiction is a creative tradition far older than the modern internet age
• Why Ernest Hemingway’s wartime masterpiece remains a permanent fixture of our cultural vocabulary

More in Literature · More in Art · Latest · A–Z · All topics