Why a high-profile crime thriller with an A-list cast became a box-office bomb

Entertainment · Published 3 October 2026 Swipe more like this →

In short: Despite a star-studded cast including Mark Wahlberg and Russell Crowe, the 2013 crime thriller Broken City struggled to find its footing. Plagued by a formulaic script and negative critical reception, the film failed to recoup its production costs, serving as a cautionary tale about the volatility of Hollywood investments.

Directed by Allen Hughes, Broken City marked his first solo feature film effort after years of collaborating with his twin brother, Albert. The project originated from a 2008 screenplay by Brian Tucker, which was initially recognized on the industry's annual black list of unproduced scripts. Development stalled for years until Emmett/Furla Films and Regency Enterprises partnered to bring the noir-inspired story to life, aiming to replicate the success of gritty, high-stakes dramas like Heat and L.A. Confidential.

The plot follows Billy Taggart, a former police officer turned private investigator, who is hired by the Mayor of New York City, Nicholas Hostetler, to surveil his wife. The investigation spirals into a web of political corruption involving the Bolton Village Housing Project, where the mayor and a wealthy contractor plan to displace residents for profit. The narrative relies heavily on twists, including the revelation that Taggart’s own past involves a cold-blooded murder, which the mayor uses as leverage to manipulate him.

Upon its January 2013 release, the film faced a difficult market, competing against titles like Mama and The Last Stand. While some critics appreciated the cinematography by Ben Seresin, the consensus was largely unfavorable. Reviewers frequently cited the script’s reliance on coincidence and improbability as its primary downfall. With a production budget estimated between $35 million and $57 million, the film grossed only $35 million globally, cementing its status as a box-office failure despite the presence of notable actors such as Catherine Zeta-Jones and Jeffrey Wright.

The film's reception highlights the gap between star power and narrative substance. While audiences polled by CinemaScore gave it a B, critics on Rotten Tomatoes awarded it a low 26% approval rating. Ultimately, the film serves as an example of how even a well-funded production with a clear vision for an 'edgy' noir aesthetic can struggle when the underlying story fails to resonate with contemporary viewers.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

• How a Troubled $100 Million Crime Epic Became a Global Box Office Success
• Why a 2013 Crime Thriller Had to Replace Its Most Violent Action Sequence
• Why did a high-budget crime drama become one of Hollywood's biggest box-office bombs?
• How a rejected neo-noir thriller became a cult classic after failing at the box office
• How Martin Scorsese finally secured his first Oscar with a Boston crime thriller
• Can a story about selling babies actually be a tender tale of found family?
• How a 1950 Western challenged Hollywood to rethink its portrayal of Native Americans
• Why Clint Eastwood's most personal film is a story about reinventing your own past
• Why Woody Allen’s most endearing character is a failed agent with a heart of gold
• Is Britain's most dangerous prisoner a misunderstood artist or a man of pure evil?
• From 16th-century scholars to Silicon Valley: the evolution of the 'bro'
• The songwriter who convinced a legend not to record his hits

More in Films · More in Entertainment · Latest · A–Z · All topics