Can a philosophy professor justify murder through the lens of existentialist thought?
In short: In Woody Allen's 2015 film Irrational Man, a depressed academic finds a sudden, dark sense of purpose after deciding to commit a perfect murder. By applying philosophical theories to real-world injustice, he attempts to transcend his existential crisis, only to trigger a series of unraveling, life-altering consequences.
Abe Lucas, a philosophy professor at the fictional Braylin College, arrives on campus in a state of profound existential despair. Burdened by depression and a lack of meaning, his life takes a sharp turn when he overhears a conversation about a corrupt judge who is destroying a woman's life through legal manipulation. Convinced that he can act as an arbiter of justice, Abe decides to murder the man, reasoning that because he has no personal connection to the judge, he will never be identified as a suspect.
The act of murder serves as a catalyst for Abe's transformation. His depression lifts, and he begins to feel reborn, viewing his crime as a virtuous deed that rids the world of an evil influence. However, his intellectual justification—which draws heavily on the works of Dostoevsky and the concept of the banality of evil—fails to account for the human element. His student, Jill Pollard, and his colleague, Rita Richards, eventually piece together his involvement after discovering his theft of cyanide from the college chemistry lab.
The film explores the friction between abstract philosophical ideals and the messy reality of human guilt. As Jill discovers incriminating notes in Abe's copy of Crime and Punishment, the narrative shifts from a theoretical exercise in morality to a desperate struggle for survival. The conclusion of the film, marked by Abe's accidental death while attempting to silence Jill, serves as a grim coda to his attempt to live beyond conventional ethics. Critics remained divided on the work, with some viewing it as a minor entry in Allen's filmography, while others noted its cynical, reflective tone regarding the director's own career.
Ultimately, the film functions as a dark meditation on the dangers of applying rigid intellectual frameworks to complex moral dilemmas. By framing murder as a solution to existential boredom, Abe Lucas becomes a cautionary figure, illustrating how the pursuit of a 'worthwhile' life can lead to catastrophic moral failure. The film's mixed reception reflects the difficulty of balancing its comedic and dramatic elements, leaving audiences to grapple with the same unsettling questions that haunt its protagonist.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Irrational Man (film)
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/entertainment-irrational-man-film.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Films · More in Entertainment · Latest · A–Z · All topics
