Can a film about debunking psychics reveal the limits of our own skepticism?
In short: In the 2012 thriller Red Lights, a physicist and a psychologist dedicate their lives to exposing fraudulent psychics. Yet, when they encounter a legendary performer, their rigid scientific worldview begins to fracture. The film explores the thin, often blurry line between unexplained natural phenomena and the comfort of belief.
Directed by Rodrigo Cortés, Red Lights follows Margaret Matheson, a psychology professor, and her assistant Tom Buckley as they systematically dismantle claims of the paranormal. The narrative centers on their confrontation with Simon Silver, a famous blind psychic who returned to the spotlight after a decades-long hiatus. The film’s tension relies on the contrast between the protagonists' methodical use of surveillance equipment to expose stage tricks and the inexplicable, chaotic events that begin to plague them as they get closer to Silver.
The production process itself mirrored the film's thematic divide. Cortés spent eighteen months researching the debate between skeptics and believers, concluding that both sides often ignore evidence that contradicts their established positions. While Cortés maintains a personal skepticism, noting that nothing can exist outside natural laws, he distinguishes this from the paranormal, which he views as potentially natural phenomena that science simply has not yet explained. Conversely, Robert De Niro, who played Silver, reported that his own meetings with real-world psychics left him with a cautious, lingering belief that they were picking up information through unknown means.
Upon its 2012 release, the film polarized critics. While some praised the initial hour for its sharp, intellectual dialogue and tense atmosphere, many felt the conclusion—marked by elaborate special effects and a violent confrontation—undermined the story's earlier promise. Despite a cast including Cillian Murphy and Sigourney Weaver, the film holds a 30% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics like Michael Nordine and Jeannette Catsoulis argued that the film’s shift from a grounded psychological mystery to a more conventional, spectacle-heavy thriller caused it to lose its way, ultimately failing to satisfy the audience's expectations for a coherent exploration of its central premise.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Red Lights (2012 film)
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/entertainment-red-lights-2012-film.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Films · More in Entertainment · Latest · A–Z · All topics
