Why middle-income democracies can be more dangerous than war zones
In short: Democracy advisor Rachel Kleinfeld challenges our perception of global safety. She argues that political polarization and inequality in stable nations may pose a greater risk of violence than active warfare.
Kleinfeld explores a historical shift in the nature of violence, suggesting that the deadliest environments are increasingly found in middle-income democracies. The primary drivers identified are high levels of inequality and intense political polarization.
The talk argues that because these issues are rooted in domestic governance, regular voters have a unique opportunity to act as a force for change. While ending a war is difficult for an individual, correcting the 'rotten' structures of a democracy is a path to global security.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Rachel Kleinfeld: A path to security for the world's deadliest countries
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/history-a-path-to-security-for-the-world-s-deadliest-countries.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in History · Latest · A–Z · All topics
