Epidemiology may be better understood as measuring effects rather than proving causes

Epidemiology may be better understood as measuring effects rather than proving causes
Image: Intellect (generated)

In short: A theoretical discussion of epidemiological principles suggests that determining causation is not a settled process. The authors argue that instead of using strict criteria to decide if an effect exists, researchers should view causal inference as an exercise in measuring the magnitude of an effect.

The authors explore how models of sufficient and component causes can illuminate complex principles like multi-causality and interaction. They note that because philosophers find flaws in all philosophies of causal inference, the role of logic and observation remains unsettled. This paper is a conceptual review of causal theory rather than an empirical study.

Why it matters: Shifting the focus from proving causes to measuring effects provides a more practical framework for epidemiology.

Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.

Sources

To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/history-research-epidemiological-causal-inference-is-better-viewed-as-measuri.

How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

Finding something worth knowing…