Why researchers should avoid using positionality statements in scientific literature
In short: Researchers Savolainen and colleagues argue that the growing trend of including positionality statements in scientific papers may actually be counterproductive. They suggest that these reflexivity statements, which aim to address the limits of knowledge production, face fundamental problems regarding credibility and the preservation of scientific impartiality.
The authors argue that these statements are inherently constrained by the very biases they attempt to disclose. They propose that instead of individual biographical disclosures, the scientific community should focus on strengthening the collective, transparent processes of truth-seeking and methodological rigor to reduce bias.
Why it matters: The paper challenges the modern trend of self-disclosure in science, favoring rigorous methodology over personal reflexivity.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Research: Savolainen et al. (2023). Positionality and Its Problems: Questioning the Value of Reflexivity Statements in Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/history-research-why-researchers-should-avoid-using-positionality-statements.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in History · Latest · A–Z · All topics
