Why corrections often fail to stop the spread of fake news
In short: We often assume that simply debunking a lie will set the record straight. However, research suggests that misinformation is uniquely durable and resistant to small-bore fixes. To protect the truth, we must look beyond simple fact-checking and address the structural ways rumors stick to our social fabric.
Political scientist Adam Berinsky, who began rigorous experiments on misinformation about 15 years ago, describes rumors as 'sticky.' His research indicates that significant portions of the U.S. public believe false statements, while others remain noncommittal. This persistence makes it difficult for society to operate on a shared basis of fact and law, particularly in high-stakes areas like public health and medicine. One of the most surprising findings in Berinsky's work is that corrections from neutral fact-checkers have little impact on the phenomenon. The spread of false stories can tank economies and sway elections. These rumors also sow discord in everyday life. Misinformation creates conditions where hate can grow and fester. It makes it difficult for people to use their humanity to find common ground.
While it might seem intuitive that providing the truth would neutralize a lie, the effects are often short-lived. A more effective—though harder to achieve—tactic involves having political leaders issue corrections in instances where it does not serve their own self-interest. MIT's Mitsui Professor of Problems in Contemporary Technology is Berinsky. He serves as the director of the Political Experiments Research Lab. His work on this topic resulted in a book published by Princeton University Press in 2023.
This highlights the difficulty of correcting misinformation when it is deeply embedded in partisan divides. Several factors contribute to this environment. First, qualified experts are currently held in lower esteem than in the past, a trend observed across U.S. political parties. Second, while rumors are an age-old human occurrence, social media has fundamentally changed the speed and scale at which they spread. Finally, because many citizens do not follow politics closely on an ongoing basis, they often rely on information from their immediate social circles, where misinformation can more easily gain traction and reinforce existing biases. Chancellor Melissa Nobles noted that misinformation encourages polarized thinking. It makes it hard for us to evaluate complex issues. Experts and leaders must think collaboratively to bring different research together. We need consistent, multifaceted efforts to make progress on this problem.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Sinan Aral: How we can protect truth in the age of misinformation
- Also: Misinformation is all around. How can we combat it?
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/technology-how-we-can-protect-truth-in-the-age-of-misinformation.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
