Finding something worth knowing…

Art

Action cinema was named late but argued over for decades

Chases, fights, shootouts, explosions, and stunts feel like an obvious genre, yet scholars have debated what an action film really is since the 1980s. The label appeared in the 1910s, but critics say the modern form arrived with New Hollywood anti-heroes—and still gets mocked for spectacle over story.

Action film usually means movies built around chase sequences, fights, shootouts, explosions, and stunt work. That checklist is common ground; the deeper definition is not. David Bordwell and others have cast the genre as favoring spectacle over storytelling, while Geoff King and Charles-Antoine Courcoux push back. Scott Higgins noted in Cinema Journal in 2008 that action is both hugely popular and routinely derided for putting fireworks ahead of finely tuned narrative. Lennart Soberson traced the scholarly argument to the 1980s in the Journal of Film and Video.

Promotion used phrases like action or action-adventure as early as the 1910s, yet only in the 1980s did action settle as its own marketing and reviewing category. Many histories tie the contemporary sense to New Hollywood and late-1960s and 1970s anti-heroes drawing on war films, crime pictures, and Westerns. Harvey O'Brien argues a true action movie is more than a string of set pieces: Raiders of the Lost Ark and Die Hard may both be blockbusters with assertive heroes, but only some films organize themselves as cinema of striking back.

Two big transnational streams stand out: Hollywood styles copied worldwide, and Chinese-language martial arts cinema. Shanghai martial arts films of the late 1920s were popular—nearly sixty percent of Chinese output in that period—though Man-Fung Yip calls them tame by later standards. Japanese chanbara, a sword-fight branch of jidai-geki, peaked as Asian cinema gained global notice after breakthroughs such as Kurosawa's Rashomon in 1950. By the late 2010s, analysts often speak of mode or narrative form as much as genre—labels that blur, yet keep pointing at the same kinetic contract with the audience.

Source: Action film

Related

More in Art · All topics