How a $100 Million Sci-Fi Comedy Became One of Cinema’s Greatest Financial Disasters

Entertainment · Published 3 October 2026 Swipe more like this →

In short: Released in 2002, this ambitious lunar-set action film starring Eddie Murphy is remembered less for its plot and more for its staggering commercial failure. Despite a massive budget and a high-profile cast, the production struggled through years of development, resulting in a project that critics and audiences largely rejected.

The film follows Pluto Nash, a former smuggler and nightclub owner living in a lunar colony in 2080. After his club is destroyed by henchmen working for a mysterious entrepreneur named Rex Crater, Nash discovers that his antagonist is actually a clone of himself. The narrative, which involves cloning conspiracies and futuristic mobsters, was the result of a long, troubled development cycle that began as early as 1983. Various directors and stars were attached to the project over nearly two decades before it finally reached the screen.

Director Ron Underwood spent four years on the production, grappling with a script that underwent constant revisions. Eddie Murphy, who played both the protagonist and his clone, reportedly rejected multiple drafts, seeking a more serious tone while intending to provide the humor himself. Underwood later admitted he felt the film lacked a cohesive narrative core and failed to achieve the intended wit. The situation worsened when a leaked review of an unfinished cut prompted the studio to order expensive reshoots, ultimately ballooning the budget to $100 million.

Upon its August 2002 release, the movie was a catastrophic box-office bomb. It earned only about $7.1 million worldwide, a fraction of its production costs. Critics were scathing, with the film holding a 6% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and earning multiple Golden Raspberry Award nominations. Even the cast and crew were aware of the production's shortcomings; Joe Pantoliano, who played one of the henchmen, noted that the project felt off-target during filming. Today, it remains a textbook example of a high-budget studio project that failed to resonate with the public.

The film's legacy is defined by its status as one of the most expensive flops in history. While some minor critical voices suggested the backlash was excessive, the consensus remains that the project was neither adventurous nor funny. Eddie Murphy himself later joked about the film's tiny audience, acknowledging the widespread disdain for the project that had once held such high expectations.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

• A giant Eddie Murphy robot was the centerpiece of this 2008 box office disaster
• How a disastrous sci-fi production became a cult classic about unlikely brotherhood
• Why did a major studio film starring Eddie Murphy end up with zero percent?
• How a 1979 disaster film became a real-life catastrophe for its studio
• Why the 2002 big-budget adaptation of I Spy became a notorious box-office failure
• The 1938 masterpiece that traded period accuracy for Technicolor spectacle
• Why a critically panned 1990 action comedy became a cult classic music industry mystery
• Why the 2000 Rocky and Bullwinkle film failed to capture its original magic
• Why a beloved Sesame Street feature film struggled to find its audience at theaters
• How a child's daydreams became a 3D superhero film with a cult following
• How a Soviet musical transformed a classic Italian puppet into a cultural icon
• How a 1939 film cemented the world's most famous, yet non-canonical, detective catchphrase

More in Films · More in Entertainment · Latest · A–Z · All topics