Can a best-selling pregnancy guide successfully transition into a Hollywood romantic comedy film?

Can a best-selling pregnancy guide successfully transition into a Hollywood romantic comedy film?
Image: Intellect (generated)

In short: When Lionsgate adapted Heidi Murkoff's iconic pregnancy manual into a 2012 film, they faced a unique challenge: turning a non-fiction guide into a narrative feature. The resulting ensemble comedy follows five couples navigating the chaotic, often humorous realities of impending parenthood, but did the adaptation live up to its source?

Heidi Murkoff's 1984 book, often dubbed the bible of American pregnancy, has sold over 20 million copies and remains a cultural touchstone. When Lionsgate acquired the rights, they envisioned a franchise based on the brand's universal appeal. Director Kirk Jones, who initially mistook the guide for a novel, sought to capture the funny, tragic, and exciting nature of the pregnancy experience by weaving together five simultaneous storylines. The production, filmed in Atlanta in 2011, required a complex logistical approach, with Jones shooting entire character arcs in two-week blocks to accommodate the schedules of a massive ensemble cast including Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Lopez, and Elizabeth Banks.

The film explores diverse paths to parenthood, from adoption struggles in Ethiopia to the physical and emotional tolls of pregnancy. Characters face varied hurdles, such as the debate over circumcision, the reality of caesarean sections, and the unexpected grief of miscarriage. To ground the film in authenticity, casting directors held open calls for real pregnant women and infants, aiming to capture the raw, unscripted energy of the experience. The soundtrack, featuring an eclectic mix of artists from The Notorious B.I.G. to Natasha Bedingfield, further emphasizes the film's attempt to balance drama with a lighthearted, commercial tone.

Critical reception was largely mixed. While some reviewers appreciated the humanity brought by the cast, others felt the film relied too heavily on rom-com clichés and lacked the depth of its literary namesake. Rotten Tomatoes reported a 23% approval rating, with critics noting that the film felt disjointed compared to the engaging enlightenment of the book. Despite the mixed reviews, the film grossed $84.4 million worldwide. Ultimately, the project serves as a case study in the difficulty of translating a non-fiction brand into a narrative structure, highlighting the tension between commercial franchise potential and the nuanced, personal stories of the individuals it aims to portray.

Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.

Sources

To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/entertainment-what-to-expect-when-you-re-expecting-film.

How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

Finding something worth knowing…