Can a machine offer comfort without actually feeling it?
In short: We are increasingly turning to AI to soothe our deepest anxieties and loneliness. But while a chatbot can mirror your words perfectly, is there a fundamental difference between a system that responds and a human who empathizes? Exploring the architecture of digital intimacy reveals what we might be losing.
In 2026, Professor Matt Jones explored the rise of large language models and biofeedback systems designed to simulate therapeutic dialogue. While these tools can effectively scaffold reflection, they operate on a different principle than human therapy. Constructed upon 'load-bearing walls'—representing memory, boundaries, an ending, silence, repair, and structure—a conventional consulting space provides the exact environment required for individuals to disclose their personal truths.
The shift toward AI therapy is often driven by pragmatism rather than preference. In a late-2025 poll of 2,000 UK adults, 37% reported using chatbots for mental health, a figure jumping to 64% among those aged 25 to 34. Many users turn to these machines because they are available at 3:00 AM when human support is unreachable. While about two-thirds of these users felt helped, roughly one in ten reported feeling more anxious or depressed.
This isn't a new phenomenon; the desire for automated companionship dates back to ELIZA in 1966. Created by Joseph Weizenbaum at MIT, ELIZA used simple pattern recognition to turn user statements into questions. Even then, users found it possible to speak honestly to the machine without believing it was alive. Today, as AI becomes more sophisticated, the challenge lies in whether automated comfort subtly displaces human responsibility for care.
The distinction between responsiveness and empathy remains central to this debate. While AI can simulate the 'words' of a therapist, it lacks the shared experience of existence. The goal is to understand where these tools serve as useful scaffolds for self-reflection and where they might provide an imitation of intimacy that bypasses the complexities of real human connection.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: AI as Therapist? Intimacy Without Understanding - Matt Jones
- Also: AI as Therapist? Intimacy Without Understanding
- Also: podcast.gresham.ac.uk — AI as Therapist? Intimacy Without Understanding - Matt Jones - Gresham College Lectures
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/ideas-ai-as-therapist-intimacy-without-understanding-matt-jones.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Artificial intelligence · More in Ideas & Philosophy · Latest · A–Z · All topics