Why philosophy is finally moving past the human-centric view of our reality

Ideas & Philosophy · Published 3 October 2026 Swipe more like this →

In short: Object-oriented ontology argues that humans are not the center of the universe. Instead, it treats every entity—from rocks to raindrops—as having an independent existence. By rejecting the idea that objects only matter through human perception, this school of thought seeks to understand the hidden lives of things.

Emerging in the 21st century, object-oriented ontology (OOO) challenges the long-standing philosophical tradition that ties reality strictly to human experience. Since the time of Immanuel Kant, many thinkers have argued that we can never truly know the world as it exists in itself, only as it is filtered through human cognition. OOO rejects this correlation, asserting that objects possess a reality that remains withdrawn from both human perception and interaction with other entities. This withdrawal means that no object can ever fully grasp or translate another; every encounter is merely a partial, distorted approximation.

The movement was founded by Graham Harman, who coined the term in his 1999 dissertation, Tool-Being. Harman drew inspiration from Martin Heidegger’s analysis of tools, suggesting that objects reveal their true nature only when they withdraw from practical use. While Harman focuses on metaphysical substances, other thinkers have expanded the field. Levi Bryant developed 'onticology,' which emphasizes that to be is to create differences, while Timothy Morton introduced 'hyperobjects'—massive, distributed entities like global warming that transcend specific times and places. Ian Bogost has further applied these ideas through 'alien phenomenology,' using metaphors to speculate on the inner lives of nonhuman things.

Critics, however, remain skeptical. Some argue that the movement inadvertently mirrors the logic of the digital age, while others, such as Rein Raud, contend that it fails to escape anthropocentrism entirely, as the objects discussed are still defined by human conceptualization. Furthermore, commentators like Matthew David Segall warn that placing humans and objects on an equal footing risks sliding into nihilism. Despite these debates, OOO continues to influence fields ranging from ecology to platform studies, forcing a reconsideration of what it means for anything to exist in a world that does not revolve around us.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

• Does the world exist when you look away, or is it all in your head?
• Can the physical world be explained without relying on abstract, non-physical objects?
• Is the world made of objects, or just patterns?
• Is objective truth a reachable destination, or is it merely an elusive philosophical mirage?
• Does the colour green exist, or only green things? Ontology still argues
• Why the bullshitter is a more dangerous enemy of the truth than the liar
• How do we decide what is right? The core of normative ethics explained.
• Norms are not just rules; they are the invisible architecture of human reality.
• An opinion backed by facts and principles quietly becomes something stronger: an argument
• Can we say anything true about things that do not exist?
• Why choosing the right words is a philosophical challenge
• Is reality a collection of separate objects, or is it one undivided whole?

More in Philosophy · More in Ideas & Philosophy · Latest · A–Z · All topics