Does your age determine how much risk you are willing to take for rewards?
In short: Dan Kwartler examines how decision-making processes evolve from adolescence to adulthood. By observing contestants of varying ages navigate high-stakes scenarios, the video illustrates the psychological mechanisms behind how we calculate the potential benefits versus the dangers of our choices.
The video features three participants aged 12, 16, and 21. They engage in a series of tasks designed to test their risk assessment, including consuming spicy treats, navigating sticky obstacles, and traversing a path above hazardous plants. These scenarios serve as a framework to explore the developmental science of risk-taking.
Insights for the project were provided by experts from the UCLA Center for the Developing Adolescent. The content highlights how the brain's approach to weighing consequences shifts as individuals mature, offering a look at the factors that influence our willingness to pursue prizes despite significant discomfort or danger.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Would you eat a ghost pepper for a prize? - Dan Kwartler
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/ideas-would-you-eat-a-ghost-pepper-for-a-prize-dan-kwartler.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Psychology · More in Ideas & Philosophy · Latest · A–Z · All topics
