Why the most 'useless' research might be our greatest national asset

Science · Published 15 October 2026 Swipe more like this →

In short: We often prioritize science with immediate, tangible payoffs. Yet, some of our most vital modern technologies originated from experiments that seemed entirely pointless at the time. To secure a future in AI and medicine, we must protect the slow-burning pipeline of basic curiosity.

The tension in modern research lies between immediate utility and long-term discovery. While industry often seeks rapid results, physicist Suzie Sheehy argues that many contemporary technologies are rooted in centuries-old experiments driven purely by curiosity rather than a specific commercial goal. This 'basic science' provides the foundational understanding of the world that allows for later breakthroughs. MIT President Sally Kornbluth highlights this as a critical national concern. Sheehy emphasizes that these curiosity-led inquiries are what allow us to arrive at a deeper understanding of our world. This approach is necessary for navigating the current era of incredible uncertainty.

She describes universities as the primary engines for research with a long pathway to impact—work that requires significant patience because its ultimate benefits may not be visible for decades. A prime example is cancer immunotherapy; while it is a modern medical triumph, the foundational basic research began 30-40 years ago. Kornbluth notes that research occurs across universities, national labs, and industrial sectors. She believes straining this specific pipeline could lead to enormous negative ramifications for the United States in the future.

If funding for these early stages is drained, the pipeline for future therapies, quantum technologies, and AI could dry up. Kornbluth also addresses the systemic risks of shifting research exclusively to the private sector. She argues that universities serve a unique role in training the next generation of researchers. Using a pilot analogy, she suggests that if graduate students aren't trained in the rigorous environment of academic basic science, the talent pipeline for all future innovation is compromised. Protecting this ecosystem is not just about funding specific projects; it is about maintaining the infrastructure of human inquiry. The president is frequently in Washington D.C. meeting with members of Congress and the executive branch to advocate for these priorities. She views it as a responsibility of top institutions to articulate why basic science remains essential.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

• Why seemingly pointless scientific experiments are the foundation of our modern world
• Is American science losing its edge? The president of MIT shares her urgent perspective.
• The paradox of why pure curiosity fuels our greatest innovations
• Why the most profound scientific breakthroughs often hide in plain sight
• The most powerful tool in medicine is admitting what we don't know
• Why chemistry transforms rational behavior into romantic obsession
• The design of survival: How a game simulates brutal human behavior
• Space is not empty, it is the chemical factory that built our existence
• The Victorian countess who saw the future of computing
• Why finding a true Earth-like twin remains one of astronomy's greatest challenges
• Could our infrastructure learn to heal like human skin?
• Why understanding your past isn't enough to change your present

More in Science · Latest · A–Z · All topics