Why the science-religion conflict may be a failure of assumptions
In short: Is the friction between faith and reason inevitable? J. Wentzel van Huyssteen argues that progress depends on moving past absolute foundations to find common ground.
J. Wentzel van Huyssteen, a Professor Emeritus at Princeton Theological Seminary, suggests that productive dialogue between science and religion is stalled by each side treating its own core premises as untouchable. To move forward, both disciplines must critically examine their underlying assumptions rather than viewing them as absolute truths.
His work explores the intersections of epistemology, evolution, and human uniqueness. By shifting the focus from defense to critical inquiry, thinkers can explore how these two systems of thought might actually inform one another.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Beyond the Conflict Between Science and Religion | J. van Huyssteen
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/space-beyond-the-conflict-between-science-and-religion-j-van-huyss.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Space · Latest · A–Z · All topics
