Who owns a masterpiece when the artist is a monkey?
In short: From a pig named Pigcasso to a chimpanzee whose work was sold alongside Warhol, animals have entered the fine art world. But as these non-human creators gain fame, they ignite a fierce legal battle over a fundamental question: can a work of art exist without a human soul behind it?
The legal status of animal-made art hinges on the concept of 'human authorship.' In 2014, the United States Copyright Office clarified that works lacking human authorship cannot be registered. This creates a paradox for contemporary creators: while a chimpanzee like Congo (1954–1964) produced over 400 drawings by age four—earning a style described as 'lyrical abstract impressionism'—his works technically reside in the public domain. Intellectual property analysts Mary M. Luria and Charles Swan argue that because animals are not 'legal persons,' neither the owner of the animal nor the provider of the equipment can claim copyright.
This debate was crystallized by the 'monkey selfie case' in 2014, where a Celebes crested macaque took self-portraits using a photographer's equipment. The photographer, David Slater, claimed ownership because he set up the scene, but the ruling underscored that the resulting images were not intellectual creations of humans. This distinction separates 'collaboration' from 'authorship.' For instance, while elephants at the Melbourne Zoo are trained to paint, research from 2014 suggests they learn to draw the same image line-for-line through positive reinforcement, meaning the 'art' is a learned behavior rather than an independent creative choice.
Despite these legal hurdles, the market for animal art is thriving. Pigcasso, a South African pig, became an international sensation, with her most expensive work selling for US$27,000 in December 2021. Her work serves a dual purpose: it provides a platform for human-animal collaboration and funds a sanctuary for rescued animals. Whether these works are 'art' in the Duchampian sense—where the act of selection defines the object—or are merely products of training remains a point of contention among curators and scientists alike.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Animal-made art
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/art-animal-made-art.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Painting · More in Art · Latest · A–Z · All topics
