Are great apes legal persons or mere property under the law?
In short: For centuries, animals were legally classified as things. Today, a growing movement argues that great apes—bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans—possess the self-awareness, empathy, and mental time travel required for legal personhood. This shift moves the debate from their capacity to suffer to their capacity to possess a self.
The movement to grant great apes legal protections is rooted in longitudinal studies by primatologists like Jane Goodall, who observed complex social lives and individual personalities in chimpanzees. Scientific evidence has further identified traits such as 'mental time travel'—the ability to project oneself into the future—and self-control techniques similar to those used by human children. These cognitive abilities suggest a level of self-awareness that advocates argue meets standard criteria for personhood, including abstract thinking and an understanding of complex rules.
Legal recognition varies wildly across the globe. In 2007, the Balearic Islands passed legislation effectively granting great apes legal personhood rights. Argentina recognized a captive orangutan as a non-human legal person in 2016, leading to its transfer to a sanctuary. Conversely, high-profile litigation in the United States has faced setbacks; in 2015 and 2013, New York courts rejected habeas corpus petitions for chimpanzees, ruling that they cannot bear 'legal duties and societal responsibilities' and therefore remain property.
This tension highlights a shift in animal law: moving from assessing whether an animal feels pain to whether it possesses a unique 'self.' While critics argue this creates new hierarchies based on proximity to humans, proponents point out that the legal system already grants personhood to non-human entities like corporations. The debate now centers on whether these autonomous beings deserve rights to life and liberty, potentially reshaping international laws regarding nationality, citizenship, and the right to be free from harmful experimentation.
The movement is bolstered by figures such as Richard Dawkins, Peter Singer, and Steven Wise of the Nonhuman Rights Project. They argue that because great apes exhibit empathy and can delay gratification, they should no longer be treated as expendable. This transition reflects a broader 'One Health' perspective where human health is balanced against the well-being of animals and ecosystems.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Great ape personhood
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/health-great-ape-personhood.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Consciousness · More in Health · Latest · A–Z · All topics
