Finding something worth knowing…

Art

Calligraphy carries revelation across Islamic visual culture

Western historians coined “Islamic art” in the late nineteenth century for work made since the seventh century CE across Muslim lands. Public religious schemes usually avoid living figures, favoring arabesques, geometry, and script. Yet miniatures—Persian, Mughal, Ottoman—kept narrative humans and animals alive in books and albums.

Early makers absorbed Roman, Byzantine, and Sasanian habits, later Central Asian and Chinese cues in painting, pottery, and cloth. Because revelation arrives as written word, calligraphy ranks high: Qur’anic Arabic on coins, tiles, and metal; Persian poetry; later Turkish and Urdu. Kufic and naskh scripts dress walls, minbars, and domes; Chinese Arabic verses even mark Xi’an’s Great Mosque. East Persian “epigraphic ware” of the ninth to eleventh centuries, lettering alone, has been called among the most refined Persian pottery. Artists may insert tiny flaws in repeating patterns as humility before divine perfection—though that reading is disputed.

Aniconism grows from fear of idolatry and the idea that only God creates life, yet figurative art is not a late “aberration.” Umayyad desert castles (c. 660–750) and Abbasid courts (c. 749–1258) already showed humans; Cordoban ivory and Seljuk bowls seat rulers like Solomon. Before the early fourteenth century, halos marked rulers; Asian influence later swapped flame for halo. Wall painting thrived in Persianate realms, but illuminated miniatures—and later album pages—became the best-preserved tradition from about the thirteenth century, climbing to a sixteenth–early-seventeenth-century peak with bird’s-eye hills and bright planes borrowed from Chinese book formats.

Secular luxury shared the same ornamental language: carpets, glass, wood, tents. A Company-style watercolor of about 1820 records Agra’s I’timad-ud-Daula tomb—pietra dura and jali screens—built 1622–1628 by empress Nur Jahan (1577–1645) for her father Mirza Ghiyas Beg, Jahangir’s minister titled “Pillar of the Empire.” Ottoman artisans likewise jewelled everyday tools; an eighteenth- to early-nineteenth-century fire bellows combines tortoise shell, ivory, leather, copper, and brass. Scholars still argue whether one label can cover forty-plus nations, yet museums keep the category because Golden Age affinities remain useful.

Source: Islamic art

Related

More in Art · All topics