Predatory journals exploit the open-access model to profit from researchers desperate to publish
In short: Predatory publishers masquerade as legitimate scholarly journals, charging fees to publish low-quality or nonsensical research without rigorous peer review. These deceptive entities prioritize profit over scientific integrity, often trapping inexperienced authors who need to build their publication records, ultimately damaging the credibility of the entire academic research community.
The term predatory publishing was coined by librarian Jeffrey Beall, who identified organizations exploiting the open-access model to collect publication fees without providing editorial or peer-review services. These journals often use aggressive solicitation tactics, such as spam emails, and may mimic the names or websites of reputable publications to deceive authors. While the business model of charging article processing charges is standard in legitimate open-access publishing, predatory entities deviate from ethical standards by lacking transparency and failing to conduct the peer review they promise.
The consequences for authors are significant. Research published in these journals is rarely indexed in major bibliographic databases, making it difficult for other scientists to discover or cite the work. Furthermore, predatory publishers may hold submissions hostage, refusing to allow authors to withdraw their work, which can prevent the research from being published elsewhere. Because these journals often lack proper archiving, articles may disappear entirely if the publisher ceases operations, effectively erasing the author's contribution to the field.
Identifying these journals is complex because predatory publishing exists on a spectrum rather than as a binary category. Some journals may simply have subpar standards, while others are outright fraudulent. A 2022 report indicated that nearly a quarter of respondents across various disciplines had either published in a predatory journal or were unsure if they had. While many researchers are misled by a lack of awareness, others knowingly choose these outlets to meet career advancement pressures, despite the risk of damaging their professional reputation.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them
- Also: Research Guides: Understanding Predatory Publishing: Introduction
- Also: Predatory publishing
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/culture-predatory-publishing.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Journalism and mass media · More in Cultures · Latest · A–Z · All topics
