Making a reference in conversation is a two-person job
In short: Researchers studying pairs of people describing how to arrange complex figures found that naming a specific thing in conversation is rarely a one-shot act. Instead, speakers and listeners build the reference together, refining a phrase through corrections and additions until both sides are satisfied.
The researchers studied conversations from a task in which pairs of people worked together to arrange complex figures, examining how they settled on ways to refer to each one. They found a simple pattern: a speaker proposes a plain noun phrase, and if the listener doesn't question it, the conversation moves on; otherwise the phrase gets corrected or expanded until both agree. The researchers suggest this reflects a mutual responsibility to make sure each reference is understood, though the pattern comes from one specific task and may not cover every kind of conversation.
Why it matters: Agreeing on how to refer to something in conversation is a joint effort, not just one speaker's job.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Source: Research: Clark and Gibbs (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition. · cc-by-nc-nd
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/culture-research-conversation-is-a-collaborative-effort-to-build-shared-meani.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Language families · More in Cultures · Latest · A–Z · All topics
