Is it possible that true belief requires us to abandon reason?

Health · Published 18 October 2026 Swipe more like this →

In short: For centuries, philosophers have debated whether faith and logic are partners or enemies. Fideism suggests that the most profound truths are actually inaccessible to the human mind, requiring a leap of faith that defies all rational proof and logical scrutiny.

Fideism is an epistemological theory asserting that faith is independent of, or even hostile to, reason. While some 'moderate' fideists believe reason can grasp certain truths, they maintain that faith remains superior for reaching ultimate spiritual realities. This tension creates a spectrum of thought, from the 'strict' fideism of Lev Shestōv, who argued for the total rejection of reason, to the more nuanced views of thinkers like Immanuel Kant, who suggested we might need to 'deny knowledge in order to make room for faith.'

The history of this debate is filled with paradox. The early Christian thinker Tertullian is often associated with the idea 'I believe because it is absurd,' though some scholars argue he was actually critiquing intellectual arrogance rather than promoting irrationality. Similarly, Martin Luther viewed reason as a 'great enemy' to faith in divine matters, yet he conceded that, once grounded in faith, reason could serve as a useful instrument for piety. In contrast, Blaise Pascal offered a pragmatic 'wager,' suggesting that since God's existence cannot be proven, one should choose to believe because the potential reward is infinite while the loss is nothing.

Critics of fideism warn of significant risks, such as the descent into relativism or the abandonment of the scientific progress enabled by rational inquiry. The Catholic Church has historically rejected fideism, with condemnations dating back to 1348, maintaining that God's existence can be demonstrated through the natural light of reason. Even modern leaders like Pope John Paul II warned that a resurgence of fideism could undermine the very possibility of belief by failing to recognize the importance of rational discourse.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

• Is faith the opposite of reason, or a different way of knowing?
• Does philosophy create our beliefs or merely justify them?
• Can logic actually capture the essence of religious belief?
• Is faith belief without evidence, or trust with good reasons?
• Is faith inherently irrational or a different kind of logic?
• Is the pursuit of profit the primary driver of modern health disparities?
• The invisible hand keeping our hospitals running and safe
• Why the motive behind your actions matters more than the results
• Buildings have eyes: How architecture reveals the hidden mechanics of violence
• From banking royalty to a pioneer of the British arts
• The invisible hand of trust in the European patent system
• The Oxford college that once provided a secret headquarters for D-Day planning

More in Ethics · More in Health · Latest · A–Z · All topics