Is Profit the Barrier to Curing Global Diseases Like Malaria?

Q&A: How Can Science Be More Open? - with Alice Williamson · 24:44 · Video: The Royal Institution · Watch at the source

In short: When the potential for profit is absent, how can vital medical research, such as that for malaria, be consistently funded and developed? Chemist Alice Williamson argues that true scientific progress demands radical transparency, advocating for a system where knowledge is freely shared for the collective good.

Alice Williamson, a chemist and science communicator affiliated with The University of Sydney, is a proponent of the open science movement. She argues that the efficiency and overall quality of scientific endeavor improve significantly when both data and foundational ideas are made available to the wider community. This belief system drives her efforts to engage not only professional scientists but also students and general citizens in the complex process of finding cures, particularly in areas like malaria.

The discussion touches upon the critical issue of funding mechanisms. Specifically, questions were raised regarding the extent of reliance on private donors, such as Bill Gates, for funding malaria research. Furthermore, a core concern addressed was establishing reliable pathways to ensure that necessary drugs are actually manufactured and distributed, even when the market incentives for doing so are minimal or non-existent.

Williamson's background includes completing her PhD at the University of Cambridge, where she collaborated with colleagues on developing two novel chemical reactions. Her expertise allows her to speak authoritatively on the intersection of chemical innovation and the necessity of open knowledge sharing. The context of this discussion was set during a talk filmed at The Royal Institution (Ri) on October 4, 2017.

The emphasis on open science suggests a structural critique of how much research is currently siloed or dependent on specific funding streams. The push is toward a model where scientific advancement is treated as a public good, rather than one solely dictated by commercial viability.

Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.

Sources

To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/ideas-q-a-how-can-science-be-more-open-with-alice-williamson.

How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

Finding something worth knowing…