From crushed insects to heavy metals, the history of cosmetics is surprisingly industrial.

Cultures · Published 29 September 2026 Swipe more like this →

In short: We rarely scrutinize the contents of our makeup bags, yet cosmetics have long relied on substances ranging from rust and crushed beetles to neurotoxic aluminum. While modern regulation attempts to manage these risks, the industry’s reliance on synthetic dyes and chemical additives remains a complex, often controversial, balancing act.

The evolution of cosmetic ingredients reflects a long history of human experimentation, often at the cost of safety. Ancient civilizations utilized minerals and toxic substances like mercury and lead to achieve desired aesthetic effects. In ancient Babylon, crushed semi-precious jewels adorned the lips, while Cleopatra reportedly used a mixture of crushed carmine beetles and ants. These early practices were not without consequence; ancient Egyptians using fucus-algin and iodine suffered serious illnesses. Even into the 20th century, the pursuit of beauty carried physical risks, such as when actor Buddy Ebsen was hospitalized after an allergic reaction to aluminum dust used for his role as the Tin Man in The Wizard of Oz.

Modern cosmetics rely heavily on synthetic chemistry and complex additives. Vibrant colors are often achieved through synthetic dyes, which in the United States must be certified by the FDA to ensure contaminants like lead and arsenic remain below legal limits. These dyes are frequently listed as codes, such as C.I. 19140 for tartrazine. Other common ingredients, such as castor oil, are prized for being non-comedogenic, while pearlescence is typically created using mica coated with titanium dioxide. The industry also employs preservatives like formaldehyde-releasing agents in mascara to prevent bacterial growth, though these can become ineffective as products age.

The regulatory landscape for these ingredients is fragmented. While the European Union maintains strict oversight through the Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009, including specific rules for nanoparticles, United States regulation is notably weaker. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the FDA does not require pre-market approval for most cosmetic ingredients, placing the primary legal responsibility for safety on the manufacturers themselves. This hands-off approach has sparked ongoing debate, particularly regarding the long-term health implications of ingredients like aluminum salts in antiperspirants, which have been linked to neurotoxic effects in various animal studies.

General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.

Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?

Related

• Cosmetics once poisoned wearers for pale skin
• From ancient ritual to modern industry, cosmetics have shaped human status for 7,000 years.
• From ancient Egyptian ritual to Hollywood glamour, the toxic history of face powder
• The lethal beauty standards that once defined the face of civilization
• The hidden health costs of the beauty industry's toxic trio
• How a German officer's mistress risked everything to save 12 lives
• From mammoth remains to a modern hub, how Ilford transformed its identity
• Your washing machine might be harming the ocean more than you think
• The keyboardist who defined the sound of British rock and became a session legend.
• How Isaiah Rashad evolved from a Chattanooga dreamer to a critically acclaimed rap artist
• How a struggling rock singer became the unlikely architect of a city's victory anthem
• The Persian transformation: how a conquered empire redefined the Islamic world

More in Clothing and fashion · More in Cultures · Latest · A–Z · All topics