Who owns a culture? The shifting ethics of anthropological fieldwork
In short: For decades, anthropology was often a one-way street: researchers observed and documented others. Today, the field faces a reckoning over who has the right to represent these stories. Michael Asch explores how the discipline is moving from mere observation toward a complex dialogue on rights, representation, and cultural ownership.
Michael Asch, a retired professor from Alberta and Victoria Universities, addresses a fundamental shift in how we study human societies. His work highlights a transition in anthropology from a history of 'doing fieldwork' to a rigorous examination of the ethics behind that practice. This involves moving beyond simply collecting data to confronting the power dynamics between the researcher and the community being studied. His insights were featured in a production by Anthropologie et Sociétés and the Université Laval. This project was created alongside Anthropologica and the Canadian Anthropology Society. These collaborations emphasize the collaborative nature of modern ethnographic study.
A significant portion of Asch's research focuses on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, particularly within the Canadian context. He examines how political reality can be shaped by acknowledging the 'foundingness' of aboriginal nations. His work often navigates the friction between traditional institutions and modern economic pressures, such as those seen in the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Commission discussions or the development of the Dene economy. He has published numerous papers on topics like kinship and drum dances in Northern Dene communities. His research also covers the representation of Indigenous society within Canadian legal frameworks. He specifically looks at negotiations between Native and non-Native northerners.
The nuance lies in the tension between different modes of production and theoretical orientations. For instance, Asch critiques specific judicial recommendations—like those of Mr. Justice Berger—regarding capital sources for Indigenous communities. He argues that government grants can have negative impacts compared to rents and royalties, illustrating how even well-intentioned policy can clash with traditional values. His scholarship emphasizes that true cultural preservation requires navigating these complex legal, economic, and ethical landscapes. He analyzed how a staples theory approach compares to other modes of production for economic development. His work also addresses the translation of political rights into actual reality. These studies help clarify how traditional values survive within modern capital structures.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Michael Asch. Film 9. The History of Anthropology and the Ethics of Doing Fieldwork
- Also: Michael Asch - Profile on Academia.edu
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/culture-michael-asch-film-9-the-history-of-anthropology-and-the-ethi.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Ethnology and anthropology · More in Cultures · Latest · A–Z · All topics