How a Washington think tank shapes the future of American military strategy and policy
In short: Founded in 2007, the Center for a New American Security has become a central hub for national security expertise. With deep ties to Democratic administrations and a roster of high-profile donors, it influences defense policy through war games, strategic reports, and a pipeline of personnel moving into government roles.
Operating from Washington, D.C., with a budget under $6 million and roughly fifty employees, the organization specializes in issues ranging from irregular warfare to the geopolitical rise of Asia. It gained early prominence during the Obama administration, with The Washington Post noting in 2009 that it was emerging as a go-to institution for military affairs. Its influence is sustained through a steady flow of talent; many fellows and leaders, such as former CEO Victoria Nuland, have transitioned directly into senior government positions.
The think tank’s research often involves complex simulations, such as 2024 war-gaming experiments exploring potential conflicts between China and Taiwan. These studies frequently advocate for technological shifts, including the integration of underwater drones and increased operational autonomy. Beyond military hardware, the organization produces extensive policy series, such as the 2016 'Papers for the Next President,' which provided actionable recommendations for the incoming administration. It also maintains a fellowship program to cultivate the next generation of national security leaders.
However, its funding model has drawn scrutiny. The organization receives support from major corporations, including defense contractors like Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and Raytheon, as well as foreign governments. Critics, including left-wing media outlets, have argued that this financial structure encourages a push toward militarism. Reports from the Revolving Door Project have alleged that the center has violated its own ethics policies, citing instances where funding from entities like Taiwan or the United Arab Emirates coincided with research recommendations that benefited those donors. While the center maintains it keeps a clear line between its research and corporate interests, these accusations highlight the tensions inherent in a private institution deeply embedded in public policy.
Opens the Intellect+ feed with this card first. Swipe up for the next one.
Sources
- Summary by Intellect · source: Center for a New American Security
To cite this card, link to https://intellectplus.co.uk/app/science-center-for-a-new-american-security.
How we source, check and correct cards: Editorial standards.
General information, not professional advice. Spotted an error? Flag the card or see corrections and complaints.
Intellect Plus is a visual educational discovery platform for exploring fascinating facts and ideas. Brain Food, Not Brain Rot. What is Intellect Plus?
Related
More in Physics · More in Science · Latest · A–Z · All topics
